Pockets Inc.

Confusing and Odd Rules I’ve been to this place before and genuinely enjoyed it. The atmosphere was fun, and the food was good, but I do have some criticism and, ideas? The rule requiring 18 to 20 year olds to be accompanied by an individual over the age of 21 seems unnecessary. Pool and alcohol have no connection, and legal adults between 18-20 are more than capable of responsibly navigating the space on their own. Requiring supervision does not reduce any real risk and feels arbitrary. Places like Buffalo Wild Wings have bars visible in the restaurant, yet guests of all ages can be present safely. Pockets could operate similarly: 18 to 20 year olds could play freely, while minors remain under supervision until its 8:30 and time to wrap up. You can definetly argue that this rule protects against liability or insurance issues, but 18 to 20 year olds are legal adults capable of following rules. And if rules and standards aren't being met, thats when staff should remove them, as they would with anybody else that causes problems. If the environment were genuinely dangerous for those under 21, then no one under 21 should be allowed in. Allowing responsible 18 to 20 year olds to pla

Had high expectations for this place we were enjoying a fun pool session with friends and accidentally dropped a cue while placing back in its spot and we were immediately kicked out in a very rude manner. I understand that the equipment is high maintenance but the way it was handled left a sour taste in my mouth. Treat your paying customers with a little more respect is all I’m asking. If you want to be treated like garbage this is your place to come! Wouldn’t recommend to anyone trying to enjoy a fun afternoon.

So, due to recent events involving a DUI patron being allowed on premise by the owners---and the patron subsequently being caught by a person known to them and being reported for violating their court ordered abstinence, I cannot abide by their response on Facebook about this incident. It is not only the responsibility of the probationary person to abstain from alcohol, but if they are in an establishment that serves alcohol FOR ANY EVENT, and the owner KNOWINGLY allows it---no matter the excuse---it is the responsibility of others to notify the court that the person on probation is violating that court agreement. Why do you think that person was required by the court to NOT be in ANY bar? For fun? People die in DUI related incidents regularly. Do you think that you or this person is above the law and their restrictions set forth by the court? You're not special. Your willingness to to allow a person convicted of DUI or any alcohol related crime to be in your place of business, near the very thing that placed them in the courts visage places your license and judgement in question. Making sure people don't reoffend IS the business of the court AND the public. Mind my business?

This is a bar that offers and specializes in pool. They have a lot of different tables to choose from. Even on a busy night, you’re not going to wait long to get some pool in. They also have a grill inside where you can get some greasy food, just what you’d expect from a bar. Hamburgers, fries, soft drinks, beer, alcohol, tater tots, etc… it’s always worth a visit here.

I arrived with a group of 8! Perhaps, that was too much. Bartender was very unfriendly! Went and used the restroom. As I turned the corner a sewer/septic smell smacked me in the face. I noticed in the floor stall that the drain was overflowing. Between the smell and what seemed to be the unfriendly server it was time to go elsewhere. We all agreed it was best we found a new establishment to hang out! Establishment needs major help!